tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2280966215016131075.post255075641589612373..comments2023-02-12T00:32:52.049-08:00Comments on (cadr life): Beyond web.xmlAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06848042365037213287noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2280966215016131075.post-59967872342166593782009-04-25T15:53:00.000-07:002009-04-25T15:53:00.000-07:00Actually, JRead was based on a 100% web-xml free J...Actually, JRead was based on a 100% web-xml free Jetty.Dan Watthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03957050493525830705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2280966215016131075.post-87674854988409526772009-03-14T15:29:00.000-07:002009-03-14T15:29:00.000-07:00Dan: Yeah, you were definitely the inspiration for...Dan: Yeah, you were definitely the inspiration for that one -- though your version still requires the web.xml (unless you've got something I haven't seen).Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06848042365037213287noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2280966215016131075.post-69731473816396970662009-02-07T10:23:00.000-08:002009-02-07T10:23:00.000-08:00Now Ray, give credit where credit is due... Who ca...Now Ray, give credit where credit is due... Who came up with the quick and dirty ESR? :)Dan Watthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03957050493525830705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2280966215016131075.post-22052602489634244852009-01-14T15:40:00.000-08:002009-01-14T15:40:00.000-08:00rboyd - Nothing against Rails, I'm actively using ...rboyd - Nothing against Rails, I'm actively using it. I'm really excited about the merge with Merb!<BR/><BR/>There are various reasons why I might choose Java over Ruby for a one-off web app. I might need a library. I might need the performance for some computationally intensive task. I might be more experienced in it. I might work at a Java shop.<BR/><BR/>I'd also like to remind the community that not everything written in a language other than Ruby is "legacy code" ;)<BR/><BR/>Now <I>parsing</I> in Java... that's just crazy :P<BR/>I'd use Haskell for that.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06848042365037213287noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2280966215016131075.post-6769883361609262192009-01-14T11:58:00.000-08:002009-01-14T11:58:00.000-08:00Man.. We use Hudson for CI and getting tomcat run...Man.. We use Hudson for CI and getting tomcat running happily was definitely a chore.<BR/><BR/>I kinda liked the rails option, personally. What's the hold up on that? What's the argument against? Years of legacy code? Bah.<BR/><BR/>I guess Java's not really as bad as it used to be -- Ian and I have been hammering through a good amount of Java lately, building ANTLR grammars.<BR/><BR/>Cheers!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2280966215016131075.post-14440403964265886932009-01-14T07:01:00.000-08:002009-01-14T07:01:00.000-08:00Nice (jetty, that is). Not quite rails-a-riffic, ...Nice (jetty, that is). Not quite rails-a-riffic, but nice. ; )Ethan Viziteihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16886242271824345907noreply@blogger.com